I just don't understand and worry about why he cannot see his weakness, and why he has to be so stubborn. In my view, he seems to evaluate one's English as good or bad not completely based on whatever one writes, but on whom one is--Chinese or native speakers, which is extremely subjective.
See, he thought of Monica's paper as mine, so that he "pointed out " many mistakes. If he really knows something about what real English is, he should know that writing is superior and wonderful. He made his coomments based on what the writer is, not what the contents are.
And that is what makes me feel painful and confused.
See, he thought of Monica's paper as mine, so that he "pointed out " many mistakes. If he really knows something about what real English is, he should know that writing is superior and wonderful. He made his coomments based on what the writer is, not what the contents are.
And that is what makes me feel painful and confused.