本文发表在 rolia.net 枫下论坛sorry for voting for them

More than 1/4 century here, first 1/8 century never vote. if the time the Bob Ray's NDP Government didn't make the Ontario's finance almost going to be bankrupt, I would never get out for my 1st vote, so did my friends. Only 4 votes for national up to now, but I want to say sorry for the first 3 times that had voted Liberal. I woke up last year, and talked to my friends, but they were still loved the Liberal very much. Now 100% of them have change their direction to Conservative.
The Liberals have been acting very beautifull such as honest group, tax cutter, money saver, peace lover, democrat lover, freedom lover, immigrant lover, Chinese lover & humman right protector by sending out the rumours that Stephen Harper's hiding some thing, the Conservative would go to the war & spending money on military equipments , they hated immigrants,et. - - . They are steal but call some one else steal.
Today, most of the Liberals still not saying sorry to Canadian, seems they still in trust, do you think the time rewind to 12 years ago?
Are they immigrants & Chinese lover?
The Chinese Conversative MP Ink Mark was on Fair Child TV on April 13, 2005, he wants to bring back his concern about the sister & brother to be the core of family for priority immigration that was rejected by Liberal government. His Bill about correcting the head tax was rejected by them too.
1st time, I voted Liberal because they said that they would cut the GST, 2nd & 3rd votes were the extensive hope from the 1st one. I was very patient to wait for more than 12 years but never got any answer. I got the answer from a Chinese lady who I 1st met last year, she loved Liberal, she told me: 'the GST was a fair money producer for government & Canada, the Conservative grew the tree for Canada, now, it's the harvest time' .
Are Liberal money saver?
'Yes,' but only saved money for their scandal by buying old equipments, to buy the old Submarine that were above grand for 10 years, one died inside during the way home. and more - -
Are Liberal peace lover?
In 1998, Liberal government sent the air force to war [Kosovo ]with out voting in the Parliment.
Are Liberal freedom lover - - - -?
Freedom & democrat lover,human right protector -- Martin who made the Liberal's MP to vote Yes on Bill C 38, by forceing, to blamed Conversative MP who went to Zhao's house for the sorrow after he passed away.

Our lessons from NDP & Liberal were very expensive, so why should we vote them again????更多精彩文章及讨论，请光临枫下论坛 rolia.net

本文发表在 rolia.net 枫下论坛我’’选择’’自由党的理由如下

1镇压少数人权利,她是稱老大，加拿大自由党政府在1923年 7月1日通過1923年華人移民法案（又稱爲排華法）。 镇压在加華人的公民權利 令當時的反華情緒變得更激烈。因爲當時大多數華人都不可以說流利的英語，他們都要躲避在唐人街。 由於當時的加拿大已經有很多條例禁止華人從事多個行業，華人只可以做一些白人不願意從事的工作，例如洗衣店和三文魚加工。直至到戰後，加拿大的華人社區是可以稱爲一個單身男子社會。

她不想平反，还搞出个原則性協議
华人应感谢她，
如果没有她，
整个华人社区的政治醒觉性不会提高，
民意不会一边倒。
自由党在过去十二年执政时，在人头税问题上拒不向加拿大华人道歉赔偿，还说甚么“道歉意味着法律责任”，对于华人对加拿大建国的贡献一笔抹杀，更不承认人头税对华人造成伤害，连一句“对不起”也不肯说，态度可谓恶劣，难怪平权会要向联合国人权委员会投诉。

2. 自由党领导白人至上主义充分表现在2005年，几个自由党领导人对华人的公开侮辱，正是白人至上主义的充分表现。先有万锦区部长john Mccallum对待中文报纸记者的恶劣态度，又有国库局长 Reg Alcock 奚落华裔国会议员的基因，再有执行副主席将华裔比作狗。

我们如横沟指望 他们认 认真真地对待新移民？!更多精彩文章及讨论，请光临枫下论坛 rolia.net

本文发表在 rolia.net 枫下论坛我’’选择’’自由党的理由如下[续]

她的党领够权威，命令议员部长投Yes票 ，他们就不敢说 No
那管你说自由党内不自由。
1. 从历史大事来看觉得自由党盲目讨好米国。例如1998年,加军没有获 美国邀请， 在自由党党领一声号令, 轰炸机 立即出动炸 Kosovo小国，为了讨好米国不惜卷入 劳民伤财的不义之战。
不惜凌驾于国会之上，尽管吃力不讨好，誓要做 美国的应声虫。

她坚持加拿大在国际舞台上有自己的声音。不惜搞出众多funds,
尽管动用盈余的做法有违会计法则。
{马田担任联邦财长时，开始了设立一些公营及私营的合作计划，从而创立诸如加拿大革新基金及千禧年奖学金基金会等的组织。其后这些组织数目有所增加。估计在过去8年，这些组织获得的拨款达到90亿元。
基金会运作受诟病
上一任审计总长迪素杜(Denis Desautels)曾指称，马田在这方面动用盈余的做法有违会计法则。他亦警告称，国会难以适当监管这些拨款。 }


结果联邦赞助丑闻令政府丑态毕露。意外打败伊朗、北韩和美国等“强劲对手”，独占鳌头的获得“世界愚蠢奖”（World Stupidity Awards）所颁发的年度“蠢蛋政府”（the dumbest government）奖。
反映了自由党政府在世界的形象。

2.自由党的CHILD CARE 政策从来都是在四大政党中最”出色的”。自自由党2004年上台以来，她的政策又再是搞多fund，准备戍立child care fund，钱在她手里任她分，亲朋戚友优先分。
她不幸被三党拉下台，分fund理想难实现，誓要支持她重上台，好把俺的Fund拿过来，让 口袋里的钱多一些。

3. 承诺好听不实现！十二年前要选票，答应除掉GST。
自由党政府曾许诺会承认移民的专业资格认证，但至今没履行承诺。
工程师、医生和其他专业技术移民很多还都在打Labour。
每年都没法完成移民目标，到现在还有70万积压案。
新移民想要担保父母移民，要面临可能长达5年的等待。还不如脱衣舞女的特别签证，持着它路路通！

每个新移民在申请移民时都要交975加元“登陆费”，这是自由党政府造出来的收费名目，
虽然不叫“人头税”，只不过自由党管它叫“登陆费”而已。
财政赤字是减了,可是每一个新移民在没有享受任何加拿大福利之前却都要凭白无故地为此付出975加元的代价。真是毫无道理

4.GST及PROPERTY TAX收入丰，但不能停止大学学费账单涨，更把医疗服务搞得一团糟，还被病人告一状。
原因是硬要病人等待一年以上去享受医疗福利，他自付费求医行不通，病人受不了疾病痛苦把它告，结果被病人打败她，只好低头让他跑！
今天承诺多又多，她的党领拉票来，说是错收了人头税，又逍谦来又许诺，老汉不会被愚弄，跟他说：道谦该在国会里！十多年里你不做, 现在道谦也不会选你。
一次不忠百次不用! 难说服别人再来选她!

还有3条可以说服一些人来选她:

1 持家有道应该选她, 用买一条新潜艇的钱, 去买了四条旧的, 虽然一死多人伤在回途中, 死伤不是问题, 省军费是她的”功劳”

2 她的女党干麦莉兰表示，司法工作坊中有大量年轻党员，通过大麻及卖淫合法化是意料中事。

3. 她的党领是生财有道的好榜样，马丁先生是比布什富很箩多的大富翁,．管你大小生意交税多与少。他的公司开在BARBODOS，不用给加拿大交一分钱的税。
所以很多人都模仿他。

她的骨干是爱党爰国又爰民的好榜样!
管你安全部说老虎是恐怖组织!
为了表示亲民的好形像!它的筹虎大会就是要参加!
老虎头头们就是要接见, 他们不远万里来到加拿大。
总理怎可不见他，还要不辞劳苦组团去回访他!
因为谁选我党 ，我党就要保护他!


这么多的好处, 怎么可以不选她?
以上纯属人个观点如有冒犯敂请原谅更多精彩文章及讨论，请光临枫下论坛 rolia.net

本文发表在 rolia.net 枫下论坛新审计报告今日出炉 马田又寝食难安
加国无忧 2005年02月15日，来源：加通社

揭露联邦赞助丑闻的审计总长傅丽莎(Sheila Fraser)周二转移视线，把着眼点放在公营机构、机场租约、海外援助及研究基金内的税款方面。
傅丽莎就联邦政府开支及管理做法的最新报告正准备提交众议院。

今次的报告将不会如去年般披露赞助计划般震撼，但对于马田的少数党政府来说，任何的消息都是坏消息。
在这份分8章的报告中，傅丽莎将会重新审核一些于克里靖就任总理期间首先出现的问题，其中包括下述4点：

■运输部把全国一些最大及最繁忙的飞机场移交给地区当局方面的财务安排。

■联邦政府辖下的加拿大国际发展局所批出的合约。

■联邦公营机构在委任方面用人唯亲的做法。

■一些不经常交待开支的科研、工业创新、学生奖学金及另外一些计划获得政府拨款的问题。

马田担任联邦财长时，开始了设立一些公营及私营的合作计划，从而创立诸如加拿大革新基金及千禧年奖学金基金会等的组织。其后这些组织数目有所增加。估计在过去8年，这些组织获得的拨款达到90亿元。

基金会运作受诟病

上一任审计总长迪素杜(Denis Desautels)曾指称，马田在这方面动用盈余的做法有违会计法则。他亦警告称，国会难以适当监管这些拨款。
去年秋季，傅丽莎签发政府年度的公共帐目时，也采取了相同的看法。她于10月期间写道；“本人极之关注这些基金会的问责及管治安排。”

她的批评似乎已对现任财长古迪尔(Ralph Goodale)造成影响。原本有猜测称，政府可能设立一个基金，以便协助处理50亿元的全国讬儿服务计划，但这个选择目前看来已经不会出现在新的预算案之内。更多精彩文章及讨论，请光临枫下论坛 rolia.net

本文发表在 rolia.net 枫下论坛Hello..... My name is Alan Robberstad I am a Canadian. One voter
out of millions of Canadian voters.


Paul Martin is no friend of mine. Liberal governments have not made
my life any better. Liberal governments have made the future worse
for my children.


Jean Chretien and the Liberal Party became Prime Minister many years
ago. Guess who was the Liberal Finance Minister.....Paul
Martin...LEST WE FORGET


Since 1993:
(1) My taxes have increased.
(2) My family's share of the national debt has increased.
(3) My personal expenses have increased.
(4) My waiting time to see a doctor has increased.
(5) My concerns for my family's safety have increased.
My costs to educate my children have increased.
(7) Government interference in my life has increased.
My personal debt has increased.
(9) My income has stayed more or less the same.
(10) My savings have decreased.
(11) The buying power of my dollar, in Canada, has decreased.
(12) The value of my dollar, in the U.S., has decreased.
(13) My trust of elected officials has decreased.
(14) My trust in the justice system has decreased.
(15 )My trust in the immigration system has decreased.
(16) My hope that a Liberal won't waste my tax dollars has
decreased.
(17 )My dreams for a better future for my kids, in Canada, have
disappeared.


That is my story since the Liberals came to power.


I am not voting for Paul Martin's Liberals. I am voting against Paul
Martin and his Liberal Party in January.


I am voting for Stephen Harper and the Conservative Party.


Do I like the Conservatives? Not particularly......I don't really
like Politics. I am not political by nature. I am not passionate
about politics. I am a middle age guy (48). I live in a small house
on a fairly quiet street in Edmonton. I have a wife, Kathy, and two
children (ages 19 and 17). I have no pets. I am a middle class man.
I don't usually say too much.


Until now.


Now I am going to say something!


In 35 of the past 37 years, Canada has been ruled by:
(1) Pierre Trudeau - a multi-millionaire lawyer from Quebec.
(2) Brian Mulroney - a multi-millionaire lawyer from Quebec.
(3) Jean Chretien - a multi-millionaire lawyer from Quebec.
(4) And some people want me to vote for Paul Martin???? - a multi-
millionaire lawyer from Quebec???

The leader of the Conservative party, Stephen Harper, is:
(1) Not a lawyer.
(2) Not a multi-millionaire.
(3) Not from Quebec.


Stephen Harper says that the Conservative party will:
(1) Reduce my taxes.
(2) Pay off the national debt as fast as they can.
(3) Shrink the size and influence of the federal government.


That's good enough for me. I'm going to give the Conservative party
a chance with my vote.


But wait! Paul Martinis now saying the same thing. My mother told me
forty years ago: "Fool me once - shame on you. Fool me twice - shame
on me!"


The Liberals have had 34 years to be financially responsible.
Remember, Jean Chretien was Trudeau's Finance Minister. Remember
also, Paul Martin was Jean Chretien's Finance Minister These people
have been raising my taxes for thirty four years. They have been mis-
spending my tax dollars for 34 years.


34 years!


And now Paul Martin says he'll stop taxing and spending. No way.

Thank you for reading my story so far!


Why am I telling my story to you?

Although I feel alone, I know that I am not alone. Your story may be
similar to mine. And you may also feel alone. One small voter in the
midst of millions of voters.


What can you and I do together to change things?


Here is my idea: Lets you and I join up together. Just you and I.
Together. As a small team of two.


How can you and I fight a huge political machine?


You and I have two things that we can use:
(1) Our individual personal connections.
(2) The Internet.


The Internet is supposed to be this globalizing tool, right? Let's
put it to use.


I have 27 Canadians in my personal e-mail address book. I am sending
this e-mail to each of them.

I'm asking you to do two things:


(1) Forward this e-mail to every Canadian in your own address book.
(2) Vote against Paul Martin and the Liberal Party in January.


Vote for the Conservative candidate in your riding.


I have probably written this e-mail too late. As I said I am not
politically adroit. I feel like Peter Finch, in the 1976
movie "Network", when he shouted: "I'm mad as hell and I'm not going
to take this anymore!"


Please, forward the e-mail RIGHT NOW!!


I hope the Internet is as fast as some people claim it is.


This may not work. This e-mail may "fizzle out" and go nowhere. But
you and I will have tried, won't we have?


My best wishes to you. My best wishes to Canadians everywhere.


My thanks to David Stokes from Toronto He actually wrote this just
(5) days before the last federal election. "Fool me
once - shame on you. Fool me twice - shame on me!"


Regards
Alan Robberstad
Edmonton, Alberta .更多精彩文章及讨论，请光临枫下论坛 rolia.net

本文发表在 rolia.net 枫下论坛National Post

January 15, 2005

Your editorial (Don't Play With Tigers, Jan. 13) rightly criticizes MP Jim Karygiannis for pandering to the Tamil Tigers and their front organizations. It is puzzling why some Liberals turn a blind eye to a group that is noted for its suicide bombings, forcible recruitment of children as soldiers, arms trafficking and the assassination of Indian prime minister Rajiv Gandhi.

When I was a member of the Immigration and Refugee Board, I dealt with hundreds of refugee claims by Sri Lankan Tamils. Most had been victimized by the Tamil Tigers in Sri Lanka. The fast-track asylum process allowed innumerable Tigers to obtain Canadian citizenship and to use Canada as a safe base for their operations, including drug trafficking and credit-card fraud.

They also extort money from Canadian Tamils, as they do in Sri Lanka, to support the Tiger cause.

If Mr. Karygiannis believes the Tigers in Canada are representative of the more than 200,000 Canadians of Tamil origin, he is guilty of unforgivable ignorance.

William Bauer, Hensall, Ont.更多精彩文章及讨论，请光临枫下论坛 rolia.net

本文发表在 rolia.net 枫下论坛[转帖]A blind eye to Tamil terrorism

In Australia, Britain and the United States, belonging to or attempting to raise funds for the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) -- better known as the Tamil Tigers -- can lead to arrest or imprisonment. Given the track record of this vicious terrorist group, that makes sense. But while other countries have banned the LTTE outright, Ottawa turns a blind eye. Our government bars known Tigers from entering Canada and freezes the group's assets when officials stumble on them. But more than three years after the passage of the federal Anti-Terrorism Act, the governing Liberals still refuse to place the LTTE on Canada's official list of banned terrorist groups.

Ottawa's failure to act cannot stem from ignorance. Until a recent shaky ceasefire took effect, the Tigers' two-decade long war with the Sri Lankan government had led to 60,000 deaths, many from LTTE terror bombings and ambushes. World leaders in suicide bombings, the Tigers are known for targetting civilians -- particularly women and children. And they press-gang children into doing much of their fiercest fighting:
The LTTE's "Leopard Brigade" contains as many as 3,000 seven- to 14-year-olds who were taken from their parents as toddlers and fed a steady diet of anti-government propaganda and nihilism.

To fund all this, the LTTE extorts money from the Tamil diaspora in over 50 countries, including Canada, threatening to torture or kill loved ones back home if Tamil immigrants don't pay up. They are also notorious for drug-running and people-smuggling.

The LTTE is particularly active within the Tamil communities in Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver. Just this week, the National Post revealed that Canadian and U.S. authorities had broken up a major Tiger-run smuggling ring that had sought to sneak Tiger agents and fundraisers into Canada via Bangkok, Mexico City and the United States.

Pierre Pettigrew, Canada's Foreign Affairs Minister, explained Monday that to outlaw the Tigers now would derail a heretofore-unknown Canadian-Norwegian initiative to broker peace between the Tamils and Sri Lanka's majority Sinhalese. But the Liberals' ambivalence toward the Tigers predates any secret Ottawa-Oslo treaty negotiations.
In 2000, against the strong objections of the RCMP and the Canadian Security Intelligence Service, then-finance minister Paul Martin, then-international co-operation minister Maria Minna and several other government MPs attended a Toronto fundraising event for the Federation of Associations of Canadian Tamils (FACT) -- an organization identified by the U.S. government as a front for the LTTE. The reason was obvious: Courting the support of a vote-rich ethnic community was more important than worrying about which elements of it the Liberals were rubbing shoulders with.
To his credit, And before he left the Sri Lankan capital of Colombo yesterday, Mr. Martin himself met with three Tamil parliamentarians affiliated with the Tigers, two of whom were denied visas to enter Canada last year. Until 2002, the Liberals clung to the notion that the Islamic extremists of Hezbollah were not terrorists, either. It took nearly six months of public and parliamentary pressure to convince the government to do what would have come naturally to anyone not trawling for votes in ethnic communities. Given that the Liberals seem even more entrenched in their sentiments toward the Tigers, convincing them to outlaw the LTTE could prove an even tougher battle. But sooner or later, Mr. Martin must surely recognize that a few extra votes don't merit cozying up to the friends of terrorists.
National Post January 18, 2005更多精彩文章及讨论，请光临枫下论坛 rolia.net

还说." 连人１９２３年的事也揪出来斗，简直把ＲＯＬＩＡ当成要选ＸＸ党，　不选ＸＸ党的工具"

真是妖l言惑众!!!自相矛盾!!!不攻自破!!!


你说没时间收集那么多资料，我就把加拿大１９２３年的历史转上，但你不领情，却说.成 "连人１９２３年的事也揪出来斗，"

一個有姓氏也有名字的例子
安大略省華裔人頭稅家屬聯盟負責人George Lau在接受路透社采訪時表示，“過去，我們華人有一半人都傾向于投自由黨一票，因為我們是心存感激之情的移民。”Lau先生通過翻譯說，“但是，這個華人人頭稅問題正在改變我們的主意。我就是個例子，現在我正在重新權衡我的選票。由于政黨沒有完全它公平的工作，我已不會再為它作貢獻了。”

还说." 连人１９２３年的事也揪出来斗，简直把ＲＯＬＩＡ当成要选ＸＸ党，　不选ＸＸ党的工具"

真是妖l言惑众!!!自相矛盾!!!不攻自破!!!


你说没时间收集那么多资料，我就把加拿大１９２３年的历史转上，但你不领情，却说.成 "连人１９２３年的事也揪出来斗，"