This website requires Javascript to function properly. Please go to the setting of your web browser and enable Javascript for this website.

Ad by

推荐 OXIO 加拿大高速网络，最低月费仅$40. 使用推荐码 RCR37MB 可获得一个月的免费服务

Ad by

推荐 OXIO 加拿大高速网络，最低月费仅$40. 使用推荐码 RCR37MB 可获得一个月的免费服务

hmm

buma(buma)

what would we do with domestic violences that man shot his wife and children.
if same logic goes, shall each member of the family go get a gun and to protect themselves from the abusing fathers or partners?
gun right/control and ban are different topics, some people want gun-free, some want gun-control, some want gun-ban.
The balance in Canada at this point is good, I don't want any sides push this issue in any directions. that's why I support gun-control instead of either one of the other two.
if that makes me a leftie, heck, I have been in China for so many years, I will say I am just staying true to myself.

(#3634770@0)
Last Updated: 2007-4-25
This post has been archived. It cannot be replied.

Report

Replies, comments and Discussions:

枫下茶话 / 政治经济 / VT枪击案的启示:当一个疯子持枪向你和你的家人冲过来时,真正能保护你和你所爱的人的不是警察, 法院和禁枪法,而是在你手中的一只枪.所以,持枪和用枪的训练,不仅是权利,而是一种男人的义务,和养家保护儿童一样. -calgarian(ThanksFlames); 2007-4-24 {938} (#3633910@0)
VT的枪击案中死亡人数之多是因为VT是禁枪区,那里的学生老师只能任人屠杀.

相对比的是在今年二月, UTAH的Sulejman Talovic持枪在MALL中随意杀人,他也是新移民,几分钟内就杀死了六人.但好在MALL不是禁枪区,一个下班的警察和他对射,他才没有杀更多的人. “禁枪”只不过是让人无法反抗迫害而已.

澳大利亚1996年开始禁枪,三年后,人民无法保卫自己. 犯罪率大升.两年后,武装抢劫上升了73%,

“Two years after the ban, there have been further increases in crime: armed robberies by 73 percent; unarmed robberies by 28 percent; kidnappings by 38 percent; assaults by 17 percent; manslaughter by 29 percent, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics.
And consider the fact that over the previous 25-year period, Australia had shown a steady decrease both in homicide with firearms and armed robbery --- until the ban.”
http://www.jpands.org/hacienda/comm8.html
所以,抛开持枪保卫民主,反抗独裁的大男人的义务不提,每个有家的男人至少要有持枪保卫家庭的勇气和能力.

可以用绷弓子 -dodotoron(哇咧); 2007-4-24 (#3633917@0)

如果绷弓子伤了人,也得禁! -calgarian(ThanksFlames); 2007-4-24 (#3633928@0)

Has your Harper been trying to scrap the gun registry? -axe(Just A Joke); 2007-4-24 (#3633965@0)

青蛙的听觉器官在后腿 - zt. -buma(buma); 2007-4-24 {394} (#3633987@0)
某生理学学生要研究青蛙腿的功能，于是将青蛙放在桌上，拍一下桌子，蛙跳1米；然后切去青蛙一条后腿，拍一下桌子，蛙跳0.5米；再切去一条后腿，此时无论怎么拍桌子青蛙都无法跳跃，遂得出结论：青蛙的听觉器官在后腿。
　　但这还不够，于是该学生继续切除青蛙前腿，饱受折磨的青蛙此时终于一命呜呼，于是该学生惊呼：青蛙的生命中枢位于前腿！

=====================
不是我针对你，我看你的推理跟这个小故事有一拼。

至少这些学生们想通过实验来求证.VT事一出就跳出来要禁枪的就像干想得出青蛙的视觉在背上一样. -calgarian(ThanksFlames); 2007-4-24 (#3634003@0)

The little half yankee is such a J E R K. You must hide many guns including your HARPER's. -axe(Just A Joke); 2007-4-24 (#3634006@0)

Be honest with you, after the rampage in VT, I am going to get myself a gun at home. Of course, after a month or so. Right now, an Asian holding a gun is not such a good idea. -calgarian(ThanksFlames); 2007-4-24 (#3634012@0)

WOW, are you Asian? I remember that you did claim you are half yankee. -axe(Just A Joke); 2007-4-24 (#3634025@0)

heck, two wrongs don't make a right, enough said. -buma(buma); 2007-4-24 (#3634008@0)

你的青蛙寓言和two wrongs，看起来很有哲理，其实什么也没有说。价值接近于零。 -worker1008(worker1008); 2007-4-24 (#3634044@0)

hehe, 可能对很多人来说，价值的确就是零， ;) -buma(buma); 2007-4-24 {136} (#3634098@0)
10 secs of your precious life has gone because of reading this and it will never come back. don't claim that I ruined ur life for that.

I guess just want you to make yourself clearer. Being overly subtle sometimes is close to standing for nothing, speaking nothing, which is typical among lefties. -calgarian(ThanksFlames); 2007-4-24 (#3634190@0)

当一个疯狗张牙舞爪向你和你的家人冲过来时,真正能保护你和你所爱的人的不是警察, 法院和禁狗令,而是在你嘴中的一口牙.所以,咬人或咬狗,不仅是权利,而是一种男人的义务,和养家保护儿童一样.当然前提是你要比疯狗更疯,否则你咬不过它. -wzap(识食物者为俊杰); 2007-4-24 (#3634064@0)

虽然我不觉得楼主的说法很有说服力，不过你的说法更糟，倒像是在为楼主做证明。功力太低啊 -worker1008(worker1008); 2007-4-24 (#3634083@0)
那种情况下, 你准备怎样保护你的孩子?给疯狗上一堂普法课 -calgarian(ThanksFlames); 2007-4-24 (#3634183@0)

可怜，你生活在疯狗堆儿里。 -xiaosaihong(箫赛红); 2007-4-26 (#3638285@0)

hmm -buma(buma); 2007-4-25 {624} (#3634770@0)
what would we do with domestic violences that man shot his wife and children.
if same logic goes, shall each member of the family go get a gun and to protect themselves from the abusing fathers or partners?
gun right/control and ban are different topics, some people want gun-free, some want gun-control, some want gun-ban.
The balance in Canada at this point is good, I don't want any sides push this issue in any directions. that's why I support gun-control instead of either one of the other two.
if that makes me a leftie, heck, I have been in China for so many years, I will say I am just staying true to myself.
不要在那里含混地说事。你就直接地说，到底要怎样。是不是无论走到哪里，都要随身携带一把手枪？ -lionel(Lionel); 2007-4-25 (#3635269@0)
看来是不是该人手一枪啊。比如上班带枪，上学带枪，逛商场带枪，下馆子带枪。 -xiaosaihong(箫赛红); 2007-4-26 {599} (#3638103@0)
看来是不是该人手一枪啊。比如上班带枪，上学带枪，逛商场带枪，下馆子带枪。雇主要有枪，以防雇员生事。雇员带枪，以防雇主伤人。小学生带枪，不比担心被绑架，中学生带枪，老师不敢虐待。大学生带枪，防止第二赵承炜。老师带枪，镇着捣乱的。教授带枪，防着作弊的。幼儿园老师也带枪，看到黑苗子，先灭了。天主徒带枪，以防神父骚扰。基督徒带枪，可以杀几个异教徒。穆斯林人手一枪，不用再忍气吞声。男的带枪，可以防着bitch。女的带枪，可以不怕强奸。老的带枪，看哪个孩子敢不孝。孩子带枪，看老帮子还敢唧唧歪歪。候选人时候带枪，不选我就灭了你。选民带枪，看着你不爽，蹦了你。
人手一枪，无处无枪，无时不枪，呜乎哀哉，天下太平也。

要么限制，要么就可能变成这样。 -hhorse(hhorse); 2007-4-26 (#3638290@0)
干脆发展到国家级：每个国家都大量制造造原子弹，洲际导弹。看哪个国家不爽就先炸过去。 -lionel(Lionel); 2007-4-26 (#3638672@0)
上面的俩位左派都是一根筋,你如果想”金兵有狼牙棒,我有老婆孩子的天灵盖”,请便.只是不要用禁枪区等让别人也用天灵盖来顶狼牙棒. VT的学生老师在生命受到威胁时应有机会用枪来保护自己.但”禁枪区”让他们只有被屠杀. -calgarian(ThanksFlames); 2007-4-27 (#3639165@0)

金兵要是有原子弹呢？你的狼琊榜咋用？ -xiaosaihong(箫赛红); 2007-4-27 (#3639455@0)

CHO先生能买到原子弹吗? -sherwood(sherwood); 2007-4-27 (#3639463@0)

所以说嘛，不禁止就可以买得到啊。偶好怕啊。 -xiaosaihong(箫赛红); 2007-4-27 (#3639835@0)

怪可怜呢。昨儿个还说身边有疯狗呢，今天又多了金兵了。 -xiaosaihong(箫赛红); 2007-4-27 (#3639501@0)

持枪并不是一个简单的对错的问题. 因此才在美国陷于长期的争论. 楼主当然代表了一方的观点.并不是没有道理, 而且也很容易理解.对社会和人身造成的损失和枪只的关系也不好简单下结论. -humormaster(李聃); 2007-4-26 (#3638473@0)

李同学说的有理，枪支在美国是个历史问题，也是个文化问题。但是楼主的意图却简单的很，可以用”凡是保守的东西都要支持的“来概括。这位卡尔加里人是”屁股决定脑袋的“。 -xiaosaihong(箫赛红); 2007-4-26 (#3638513@0)

What you say might be true. But I feel you always try to put things into a black and white way. But I believe 99% of world is gray,not black and white. I feel you are not neutral, thus your opinion. -win(秋天的菠菜); 2007-4-27 (#3639511@0)

Principles are black and white. I believe people should stand for the principles they believe; however they might act practically. Besides, there are enough left propagandas for gun control. I was just trying to balance the debate. -calgarian(ThanksFlames); 2007-4-30 (#3643626@0)

@

hmm

Replies, comments and Discussions:

More Topics