×

Loading...
Ad by
  • 推荐 OXIO 加拿大高速网络,最低月费仅$40. 使用推荐码 RCR37MB 可获得一个月的免费服务
Ad by
  • 推荐 OXIO 加拿大高速网络,最低月费仅$40. 使用推荐码 RCR37MB 可获得一个月的免费服务

@

多市居民生活水平每况愈下(星岛3/14/2002)

本文发表在 rolia.net 枫下论坛贫富悬殊持续恶化 儿童耆老首当其冲

(记者陆翠霞报道)多伦多的居民生活水平每况愈下,在过去十年以来,
虽然经济有复苏迹象,但市民的收入差距及不公平的增长,令贫富悬殊问题持续恶化,
受影响的人士和数目继续上升,单亲家庭、儿童和耆老更是首当其冲。
大多市公益金与加拿大社会发展局(CANADIAN COUNCIL FOR SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT)发表的研究报告「A DECADE OF DECLINE:POVERTY AND INCOME INEQUALITY IN TORONTO IN THE 1990S」指出,比较加国的统计资料,多伦多的市民实际收入减少,贫穷情况显著增加,
生活水平亦随之下降。至于中产阶级的数目,一九九零年代末期比初期下跌。
虽然九零年代中后期出现经济复苏,本应有助改善人们的生活,
但报告所提及的情况却是背道而驰。大多市公益金总裁兰坚认为,
研究所得的结果正是响起警号,多伦多人的生活水平比十年前滑落,
需要谋求解决方案,政府及各界人士应该同心采取行动。
自一九九七年起,大多市公益金先后发表了两个有关多伦多生活质素的报告。
今次的研究重点就多伦多人的收入进行分析,并且包括在九零年代后期的经济复苏
期间的收入比较。
该次的研究发现,多伦多人的经济情况,相较九零年代的前后期,
中位收入数字已经降低。其中双亲家庭的收入下降百分之十三,
由五万九千元跌至五万一千三百元,实际收入少了七千七百元;
相比加国整体数字,这个类别只下降百分之二,由五万五千二百元下跌至
五万四千一百元,实际少了一千一百元。单亲家庭方面,
由二万九千九百元跌至二万四千六百元,少了五千三百元,
跌幅百分之十八。单身人士的中位收入下降百分之十二点五,
由二万三千二百元下跌为二万零三百元。
从一九九五年至一九九九年间,多伦多的贫穷问题持续上升,
由百分之廿二点六增至廿三点三,全国维持百分之十九点一。
处于贫穷线的单亲家庭,由百分之三十九点四,增加至百分之四十二,
上升百分之二点六;全国整体数字则下降百分之一点三。儿童及青少年的贫穷数字,
由百分之三十点八上升至三十二点三,全国保持百分之廿五点四。
在一九九零年末,贫穷人士中以耆老的数目增幅最多,为一万一千三百人,
幅度接近百分之四十。生活于贫穷线的儿童及青少年,增加了一万四千三百人,
上升百分之九点四。多伦多的高收入及低收入人士分别增加,中产阶级则减少。
相比一九九零年及一九九九年的数字,家庭总收入超过十万元的,
由百分之十八上升至百分之廿三点二;在三万至十万元之间的家庭,
由百分之六十五点二下降至五十六点九;低于三万元的,
由百分之十六点八增至百分之二十。
此外,多伦多的中位收入数字,在十二个最贫穷区域下降百分之十六,
由四万三千六百元减至三万六千八百元;在十二个最富裕的区域,
则上升了百分之十,由十一万四千二百元增至十二万五千六百元。
而报告分析多伦多聚居低收入家庭的四个区域,
分别是JANE夹FINCH,THORNCLIFFE、DOWNTOWN EAST(包括REGENT及MOSS PARKS)及爱静阁。
兰坚表示,由于社会服务的需求增加,该会拨款资助的数目亦增加了一倍,
由九六年的九百六十万增至二零零一年的一千八百八十万元,
四个主要资助范围包括儿童、露宿者、被虐妇女及新移民,
增幅分别是百分之一百二十一、一百四十二、一百零六及一百五十五。
另外,为耆老及青少年的服务增拨了一百二十万元。
在本年,该会将实施新策略,为多市市中心以外的地区,
包括北约克、士嘉堡、怡陶碧谷、约克及东约克,推行更全面的社会服务,
以配合该区的需要。更多精彩文章及讨论,请光临枫下论坛 rolia.net
Report

Replies, comments and Discussions:

  • 枫下家园 / 生活杂事 / 多市居民生活水平每况愈下(星岛3/14/2002)
    本文发表在 rolia.net 枫下论坛贫富悬殊持续恶化 儿童耆老首当其冲

    (记者陆翠霞报道)多伦多的居民生活水平每况愈下,在过去十年以来,
    虽然经济有复苏迹象,但市民的收入差距及不公平的增长,令贫富悬殊问题持续恶化,
    受影响的人士和数目继续上升,单亲家庭、儿童和耆老更是首当其冲。
    大多市公益金与加拿大社会发展局(CANADIAN COUNCIL FOR SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT)发表的研究报告「A DECADE OF DECLINE:POVERTY AND INCOME INEQUALITY IN TORONTO IN THE 1990S」指出,比较加国的统计资料,多伦多的市民实际收入减少,贫穷情况显著增加,
    生活水平亦随之下降。至于中产阶级的数目,一九九零年代末期比初期下跌。
    虽然九零年代中后期出现经济复苏,本应有助改善人们的生活,
    但报告所提及的情况却是背道而驰。大多市公益金总裁兰坚认为,
    研究所得的结果正是响起警号,多伦多人的生活水平比十年前滑落,
    需要谋求解决方案,政府及各界人士应该同心采取行动。
    自一九九七年起,大多市公益金先后发表了两个有关多伦多生活质素的报告。
    今次的研究重点就多伦多人的收入进行分析,并且包括在九零年代后期的经济复苏
    期间的收入比较。
    该次的研究发现,多伦多人的经济情况,相较九零年代的前后期,
    中位收入数字已经降低。其中双亲家庭的收入下降百分之十三,
    由五万九千元跌至五万一千三百元,实际收入少了七千七百元;
    相比加国整体数字,这个类别只下降百分之二,由五万五千二百元下跌至
    五万四千一百元,实际少了一千一百元。单亲家庭方面,
    由二万九千九百元跌至二万四千六百元,少了五千三百元,
    跌幅百分之十八。单身人士的中位收入下降百分之十二点五,
    由二万三千二百元下跌为二万零三百元。
    从一九九五年至一九九九年间,多伦多的贫穷问题持续上升,
    由百分之廿二点六增至廿三点三,全国维持百分之十九点一。
    处于贫穷线的单亲家庭,由百分之三十九点四,增加至百分之四十二,
    上升百分之二点六;全国整体数字则下降百分之一点三。儿童及青少年的贫穷数字,
    由百分之三十点八上升至三十二点三,全国保持百分之廿五点四。
    在一九九零年末,贫穷人士中以耆老的数目增幅最多,为一万一千三百人,
    幅度接近百分之四十。生活于贫穷线的儿童及青少年,增加了一万四千三百人,
    上升百分之九点四。多伦多的高收入及低收入人士分别增加,中产阶级则减少。
    相比一九九零年及一九九九年的数字,家庭总收入超过十万元的,
    由百分之十八上升至百分之廿三点二;在三万至十万元之间的家庭,
    由百分之六十五点二下降至五十六点九;低于三万元的,
    由百分之十六点八增至百分之二十。
    此外,多伦多的中位收入数字,在十二个最贫穷区域下降百分之十六,
    由四万三千六百元减至三万六千八百元;在十二个最富裕的区域,
    则上升了百分之十,由十一万四千二百元增至十二万五千六百元。
    而报告分析多伦多聚居低收入家庭的四个区域,
    分别是JANE夹FINCH,THORNCLIFFE、DOWNTOWN EAST(包括REGENT及MOSS PARKS)及爱静阁。
    兰坚表示,由于社会服务的需求增加,该会拨款资助的数目亦增加了一倍,
    由九六年的九百六十万增至二零零一年的一千八百八十万元,
    四个主要资助范围包括儿童、露宿者、被虐妇女及新移民,
    增幅分别是百分之一百二十一、一百四十二、一百零六及一百五十五。
    另外,为耆老及青少年的服务增拨了一百二十万元。
    在本年,该会将实施新策略,为多市市中心以外的地区,
    包括北约克、士嘉堡、怡陶碧谷、约克及东约克,推行更全面的社会服务,
    以配合该区的需要。更多精彩文章及讨论,请光临枫下论坛 rolia.net
    • 统计一下,在座各位家庭年收入超过10万的请举手。
      • 十万人民币
      • 哈哈。枪打出头鸟。看看谁敢接这个碴。
        • 我认识的许多朋友挣得比这多多了。
      • 只要两口子都工作,十万是少点!
        • 你光考虑IT工作了吧,其他职位薪水很低。
          • 其实没别的意思。只想看看咱们大陆移民在收入上处于社会的什么阶层。
            • 说实在的,就是十万以上,养两个孩子也够费劲的。
              • 昨天看到还有人要养 50 个呢
                • 不一样的, 人家养的是熊猫, 珍贵着呢, 越多越好.
        • 你是出头鸟1,大家鼓掌!:-)
          • 打一枪,:)
        • 这十万指的是税前还是税后? pass(funny)没说清楚.
          • 当然指税前。如果指税后,税前得15万以上。
            • 有人税前十万,税后六万;又有人税前十万,税后九万。不好比的。
          • 税后50万人民币的 只有在中国找了
            • yes.you got it.
          • 税前税后我都不敢想呀。怎么咱们新移民都这么有钱?动不动就十万?我那破工作税前也就5万,可怜。。。
            • DINK 就好了,可以享受喽 =^_^=
            • 家庭年收入包括你,你LD,你父母,你儿女,你孙儿女,你重孙儿女。。。。嘿嘿,努力啊!:)
              • 我LP也就挣个零花钱,我儿子还要倒贴20多年,5555555,我什么时候才可以达到这个水平呀?
            • 不错了,我税前更少呢. :(((.
        • (左右望望)我圈子里不少啊,只要夫妇两个都工作。
          • 怎么都把朋友当出头鸟呢?说自己啊。
            • 你是想证明多市居民生活水平还是追踪攻击目标?
              • i want to 追踪攻击目标
                • 靠!这下更没人敢出头了。
            • 我?当然也不差啊。又挣钱,又灌水,简直就是下面‘东方败了西方不能再败’的理想啊。呵呵。当然钱再多些我也不反对。象现在这样我也依然小资。怎么话题又回到小资上去了?
              • DX:今天你举手了吗?:)
                • 干嘛你一点名我就要举手? :-)
                  • 干吗点了名你还不举手?:)
          • 什么样的工作可以挣这么多钱呀?挨踢吗?
            • 据朋友说呢,卡市生活费用相对低,收入也相对低一些.你想想你的货币购买力=1.2倍的多市货币购买力了.
              • 我这里也不便宜呀,吃的还贵呢。
            • 说正经的,凭在Rolia上诸位DX的才智,只要打破僵固的思考框框,弄个年收入10万20万的如探囊取物!
              • 我是看不到什么希望,提供点经验?
                • 首先,少灌水,多干活!
                  • ROLIA上这么多大吓一天到完灌水,人家也大把挣钱,凭什么我不行?我要找一个又挣钱,有可以随便灌水的工作!
                    • 但是你可看见哪个经常灌水的DX举起他/她那害羞的小手?:)
                      • 那位萝卜DX,还有臭豆腐。。。对不起,我只记得这几位FOOD大虾,我个人对FOOD比较敏感。他们都是我的榜样呀。
      • 收入高的可不可以花点钱把自己打扮一下,街上头发蓬松,不修边幅的很多是中国人。
    • "多伦多聚居低收入家庭的四个区域, 分别是JANE夹FINCH,THORNCLIFFE, DOWNTOWN EAST (包括REGENT及MOSS PARKS) 及爱静阁",看来Y.U 附近真的糟糕啊。爱静阁是哪里啊?名字好听。
      • Agincourt. Northern Scarborough.
      • Agincourt. Centre is Sheppard/Kennedy.
        • 那里不是很多华人么?是低收入聚居区啊?
          • 新移民收入可是普遍低于本地人的.
            • 就是说多伦多的生活水平是被新移民拉下来喽?
    • 上十万确实不难,我知道好多家庭都过这条线了.在Rolia上就有数十位,我一一列出来,你要是怕我把你漏了,就进来看看
      穷鬼,你探什么脑袋!!!
      • 55, I want to find a single man.
        • 是啊 : (
        • 看着MM在这里哭,真伤心耶.....咱们俩绝对可以达标了,但我爱末能助呀. 55555......
          • 你先去忙着进化去.
        • 有年龄限制吗?
          • 没有
            下限.
            工资没有上限.
            • 稍候片刻,俺去去就来。
            • 我觉得正确的条件应该是工资有下限, 年龄没有上限
    • 哈哈。一个小时过去了,终于还是没人敢举手。:)
      • 我敢举报...
        • up
      • 我所在的group,连续工作3年以上的个人收入全都过十万。我在公司里的中国朋友,如果两口子都是在kanata工作,基本上家庭收入都过12万。当然,如果两口子都在nortel工作,许多都从高收入变为两个拿EI的。
        加拿大跟中国一样,有富人,中产阶级,穷人,慢慢努力吧。
    • Big jump in Toronto poor (...the poverty cutoff for single parent family in Toronto is $17,780, while the cutoff for a family of two parents and two children is $25,400...)
      本文发表在 rolia.net 枫下论坛Toronto's booming economy in the 1990s helped widen the gulf between the rich and an increasing number of poor, a report said yesterday.
      The same boom, and the beginning of the following slowdown, also saw Toronto, once better off than the rest of the country, fall significantly behind by 1999, the United Way report said.
      While the decline was felt across the board, an alarming number of single-parent households, children and seniors fell into dire circumstances.
      "Toronto is now spinning into decline and we need action to reverse it," said United Way executive director Frances Lankin, who presented the report by the United Way and the Canadian Council on Social Development.
      The report, which points to a shrinking middle-class and worsening poverty in Toronto's inner suburbs and some inner-city neighbourhoods, is also a portent for the booming 905 area, warned Lankin.
      She said United Way agencies in the region surrounding Toronto are increasingly reporting the same kind of social decline her agency confirmed in Toronto.
      Shobha Adore, executive director of Braeburn Neighbourhood Place and Boys and Girls Club in Rexdale, fought tears yesterday describing women who walk an hour and a half to pick up bags of used clothing, apartments that house multiple families and the 80 per cent of Braeburn food bank users who are children.
      In the report titled, A Decade of Decline, the United Way blames the growing gap between the poor and well-off on the high cost of housing, declining real incomes, reduced government income supports and a stagnant minimum wage. And it warns there will be drastic consequences in health care and social resources if the trend isn't reversed.
      The United Way uses the "low income measure" to determine poverty. Its definition of poverty is having an income of less than half the median income of a family of the same size and age composition for all of Canada. This means the poverty cutoff for single parent family in Toronto is $17,780, while the cutoff for a family of two parents and two children is $25,400.
      The study shows single parent families in Toronto were particularly hard hit with a median income drop of 18 per cent — from $29,900 in 1990 to $24,600 in 1999 — a $5,300 reduction. But two-adult households also suffered a 13 per cent, or $7,700 decline in median income, from $59,000 to $51,000 over the same period.
      Singles fared nearly as badly, with their median incomes falling 12.5 per cent from $23,200 to $20,300, a drop of $2,900. Across Canada, median incomes dropped 2 per cent in the same period.
      And the report showed Toronto is becoming increasingly polarized with middle-income families declining from 65.2 per cent to 56.9 per cent, a frightening trend, said Lankin.
      "The strength of middle-income earners is a source of stability in our community," she said.
      At the same time, those with incomes less than $30,000 rose from 16.8 per cent to 20 per cent by 1999. The number of families with incomes of more than $100,000 also grew from 18 to 23.2 per cent.
      Toronto suffers from disproportionate and deepening poverty, particularly among children, single parent households and seniors. The city's poverty rate grew to 23.3 per cent from 22.6 per cent between 1995 and 1999, compared to a national figure of 19.1 per cent, which remained stable in the 1990s.
      The largest increase was among seniors, with 11,300 more living in poverty in 1999 compared to 1995, a 3 per cent increase.
      And while single-parent family poverty actually declined by 1.3 per cent in the rest of Canada, in Toronto 2.6 per cent more single-parent families fell below the poverty line.
      Poverty among the city's children also rose in the last half of the decade to 32.3 per cent in 1999, compared to the Canadian average which remained at just over 25 per cent through that period.
      The United Way reported a third of the country's immigrants lived in Toronto during the '90s and in 1996 more than half of Canadian immigrants lived in poverty. Despite the skills qualifications required to enter Canada, the report says many immigrants are under-employed and suffer from racial discrimination.
      "I've got highly qualified IT people who come in every day looking for work," said Irene Arruda, executive director of Thorncliffe Neighbourhood Office, which has computers for community use. It is a hub of services for the area, including its large immigrant population. She said the agency is watching Canadian immigration policy closely.
      "We are seeing people coming in with a lot of skill sets under the impression they are needed here and they run into downsizing and discrimination," she said.
      Thorncliffe Neighbourhood office is in the Don Mills Rd./Eglinton Ave. E. area, which is one of four neighbourhoods identified in the report as being severely stressed.
      Its poverty rate grew 8.3 per cent between 1995 and 1999. The neighbourhood's population grew 40 per cent, compared to 8 per cent across Toronto and the number of children under 14 increased by 113 per cent.
      "We're beginning to hear stories from seniors who can't afford their apartments," said Arruda.
      The report also documents similar issues in the Jane/Finch neighbourhood, Agincourt, Regent Park and Moss Park.
      Lisa Dwyer, 29, went to Thorncliffe Public School when there was one junior kindergarten class. The school now has more than 450 children in junior kindergarten and kindergarten and the school has 44 portables.
      Dwyer, a married mother of two pre-schoolers, hopes to buy a house eventually but it won't be in Thorncliffe. "It's too crowded and it affects the school," she said. "I have some patience but I can't wait an hour for a swing."
      Shireen Ahmed, 24, attends a mother-child drop in at Thorncliffe Neighbourhood Office's children's centre. She said crowding is an issue but she "loves the culture" of the neighbourhood.
      "For the number of people, there's an imbalance of services," she said, but noted that she knows of 10 women she could call in the community if she needed help.
      Ahmed, a Muslim, grew up in Halifax with her Pakistani-born parents. There's diversity in Thorncliffe she didn't grow up with and she wants her children be exposed to cultures other than her Pakistani background and the non-Muslim majority in Halifax.更多精彩文章及讨论,请光临枫下论坛 rolia.net