×

Loading...
Ad by
  • 最优利率和cashback可以申请特批,好信用好收入offer更好。请点链接扫码加微信咨询,Scotiabank -- Nick Zhang 6478812600。
Ad by
  • 最优利率和cashback可以申请特批,好信用好收入offer更好。请点链接扫码加微信咨询,Scotiabank -- Nick Zhang 6478812600。

@

Thanks! You are right. However, I read this post somewhere and I belong to the former category. Plus the 1080p HD video makes it an easy choice being a family camera. ;-)

"On the sports thing, it really depends which sports you shoot. I shoot ski/snowboard, and rarely, if ever, have I ever needed faster AF than the D200 has. So the D7000 should be more than up to the task. The reason is, rarely do I have more than one target coming at my shot, and rarely do I not have ample time to track said target. The only time I haven't is when I was on the bottom side of a jump.

That said, if I shot something like football, football, hockey or basketball, where you can change targets faster and more often, I would think the better AF would come in handy."
Report

Replies, comments and Discussions:

  • 枫下拾英 / 摄影艺术 / 技术很烂,有一D80,主要用途为:1. 照娃;2. 拍运动;3. 风光。有必要升级到D7000吗?(技术不好靠器材弥补。)
    四年前D80拍的比赛照片:
    • 拍运动D300s/D3s
      • 谢谢!D3s肯定不用考虑了。D300s除了每秒多一帧以外(7 vs. 6),其他数据好像都不如D7000。
        • D300s对焦快
          • Thanks! You are right. However, I read this post somewhere and I belong to the former category. Plus the 1080p HD video makes it an easy choice being a family camera. ;-)
            "On the sports thing, it really depends which sports you shoot. I shoot ski/snowboard, and rarely, if ever, have I ever needed faster AF than the D200 has. So the D7000 should be more than up to the task. The reason is, rarely do I have more than one target coming at my shot, and rarely do I not have ample time to track said target. The only time I haven't is when I was on the bottom side of a jump.

            That said, if I shot something like football, football, hockey or basketball, where you can change targets faster and more often, I would think the better AF would come in handy."
          • Nikon D300s vs. D7000
            • 看下面这段话:感光元件的密度越大,对光线抖动越敏感。
              对相机的持稳度要求越高。。所谓抖动,就是曝光时间内,物像的光线点在感应器上滑动了一段轨迹,使成像多了一些虚影,从而造成不实的结果。。。那么,D300S的感光元件是6nm,D7000的是4.8nm。。当被摄物像的一个色点在传感器上移动4.9nm。在D7000上就会划过了至少两个感光元件,物像的边缘就变肉了些。。。而在D300S上这个色点可能还在一个感光元件范围内。。等于物像边缘位置没有变化,就不存在虚影。。所以,D7000对持稳度的要求比D300S高一些。。同样的速度下,很可能D300S比较清晰,而D7000比较肉。。这不是机子问题,只是对技术要求更高些了。。如果都是零抖动,D7000的像素优势就出来了。。
              • 哦,是这样子的。谢谢分析!看来真得提高技术了,因为D7000已经买回来了。;-)
                • 我在这两者之间选择了D300S, 因为更倾向于拍照而不是摄像. D300S在非全副里几乎是NUMBER ONE了.
      • 09年底LG去阿岗昆玩把D200扔水里了,废了。一直想买D300S,最近有好deal吗?
    • 拍得很好啊,能用追拍表现动感应该不是新手了,想必已经心里有数,来找点舆论支持吧?悄悄告诉一声风向,大家帮你吹,哈哈
      • 谢谢!照片是老婆拍的,我是骑车那位,哈哈哈!问题是老婆技术比我好,让我练好了再升级。阻力呀!
        • 俺用C,对N家不熟,但似乎DXXXX系列似乎不比DXX系列强,当然D7000在ISO,连拍速度,LCD显示等方面都提高了,还加了摄像可以算个BONUS。不如进个好头,象小竹炮,拍孩子拍运动都好,机身要升级的话就升到D700,全画幅对广角拍风景有利。多听听N家用户的意见吧
          • D700比D7000好,除了video.
        • 都是用auto的主,还神马技术好,马P拍得狠有水准嘛,哈哈。
          • 哈哈哈!不拍马P房顶批不下来呀。
        • 94, 还不如买个好头,
          把旧的给我
        • 听老婆的!!!!!她了解你,还技术比你强,她不升级,你升神马?