This topic has been archived. It cannot be replied.
-
枫下家园 / 生活杂事 / 这台数码相机真不错! NK880
-eglington(eglington);
2001-8-31
(#186252@0)
-
The resolution is really good. Is something wrong with the color? Her hands are ruddy.I checked its price on Yahoo. Too expensive, $649. I prefer the 2M pixels camera with lower price.
-larryxliu(bubble);
2001-8-31
{98}
(#186595@0)
-
HOW ABOUT THE PRICE AND THE RESOLUTION.I'm interested in it,because i'm thinking about .
-burtonduw(goodpig);
2001-8-31
(#186680@0)
-
3.3M, >$1000
-eglington(eglington);
2001-8-31
(#186705@0)
-
这是在多伦多吗?
-uid(㊣Miracle);
2001-8-31
(#186693@0)
-
No. Take a look here: www.dpnet.com.cn. That pic was taken by Nikon 880. very expensive to me.
-eglington(eglington);
2001-8-31
(#186699@0)
-
我说呢， 很象上海人民广场
-uid(㊣Miracle);
2001-8-31
(#186715@0)
-
should be.
-ca010406(HeyJude);
2001-9-1
(#186778@0)
-
$588 here (seems like USD)
-dennis2(Dennis);
2001-8-31
(#186713@0)
-
天哪！傻姑？！！！其实这个片子没有表现出什么啊。对焦准确只不过是基本中的基本而已。
-pasu(InTheSky);
2001-8-31
(#186736@0)
-
hahahaha,agree with you :)
-beibei(beibei);
2001-9-1
(#186812@0)
-
近距离拍摄是最容易的,根本显示不出什麽优点
-wins(wins);
2001-8-31
(#186739@0)
-
ahhh, it seems that I am an idiot...
-eglington(eglington);
2001-8-31
(#186742@0)
-
拍摄一些远距离的自然风景, 这样才能体现出一个数码像机的表现力. 3.3M 数码像机拍如此近的特写都没有太大差别.
-songl(风);
2001-9-1
(#186767@0)
