This topic has been archived. It cannot be replied.
-
枫下佳缘 / 快乐单身 / 婚前是否要做财产公证？要求公正的一方是否伤害对方的感情？
-kvn(孤帆远影);
2005-8-31
(#2479503@0)
-
Don't worry about it if the figure is < 0,5M....
-mysabre(黑胡子-豪哥);
2005-8-31
(#2479508@0)
-
It depends on both parties, if they both agree, it is OK, while if it's only
an one-party story, just forget it, as it certainly will hurt the other.
-traveller2005(traveller);
2005-8-31
(#2479690@0)
-
In my point of view, if the financial and fiscal difference is not as huge
as the ditance between the sky and the sea, it is unnecessary to do this prenuptial contract.
-traveller2005(traveller);
2005-8-31
(#2479692@0)
-
一般是财产多的一方要求财产公正。 他/她已经想好了退路。试想一个士兵上了战场，心里想的是败了往哪跑，他打胜战的可能性大吗？ 如果他
破斧沉舟，勇往向前，那他胜算的可能性就大了。 在婚姻里也是如此，如果你看婚
姻是一生一世的盟约， 没有替补队员，不管疾病，贫穷，顺境，逆境，
你会想尽办法来努力建设你的婚姻，你的婚姻也会美满得多。
-crystal_clear(水晶心);
2005-8-31
{269}
(#2479839@0)
-
这表面上是金钱问题,实际上是双方的信任问题反映到金钱观上.不被人信任和找到一个自己不完全信任的人,感受都不会很爽的.
-stillwater9(cartman&butters);
2005-8-31
(#2479901@0)
-
归根到底，世风日下。真伪难辨阿。如果都是真心的，也还是做了好。反正几年后都是一起用。
-canadiankim(为什莫受伤的总是我);
2005-8-31
(#2480146@0)
-
Do it.
-iwantcar(EnjoyStudying);
2005-8-31
(#2480169@0)
-
这是个彼此之间的信用问题。信用社会的信用，是靠契约和规则来实现的。所以，彼此之间还是有规则约束最好。
-noproblem(大可以);
2005-8-31
(#2480197@0)
-
It sounds like a pre-divorce paper to me in some sense.
-traveller2005(traveller);
2005-9-1
(#2482583@0)