This topic has been archived. It cannot be replied.
-
枫下拾英 / 乐韵书香 / “我的名字叫红“ – My Name Is Red - 读后感
-triton(持矛在丛林飞奔);
2006-11-16
{4119}
(#3323019@0)
-
大手笔，好~~ 看到认真讨论艺术史的文字就是一种快乐~
-lifesucks(选择你最喜欢的昵称！);
2006-11-16
(#3323109@0)
-
画圈。
-ely(Azry);
2006-11-16
(#3323111@0)
-
表扬一下，你写的书评真好。应该告诉大家，你是在对去年的诺贝尔文学奖作品进行评论：）
-mine888(老想上进);
2006-11-16
(#3323124@0)
-
"阅读广泛,意见中肯" (ZT)
-eagle_no1(瞎起哄);
2006-11-16
(#3323129@0)
-
wonderful writing, we could say you are a deep thinker, BTW, FYI, here is something for more reference
-table(桌子来了);
2006-11-16
(#3323173@0)
-
谢谢分享，桌子！有没有My Name is Red一书的网上连接？最好是英文版：-)
-gthm(愿闻其详);
2006-11-16
(#3323206@0)
-
Please, do not always ask for internet link about a book, an English Book, @_@
-table(桌子来了);
2006-11-16
(#3323268@0)
-
精华版 读后感！！
-wuyuhua(从此不开玩笑);
2006-11-16
(#3323190@0)
-
谢谢。有没有My Name is Red一书的网上连接？
-gthm(愿闻其详);
2006-11-16
(#3323204@0)
-
I am reading this now.....English one.... I read it very very slow....only Chap. 2 now.....thanks for sharing......
-o2o2o2(铃儿);
2006-11-16
(#3323238@0)
-
Could you please give me the link of the English version? Many thanks.
-gthm(愿闻其详);
2006-11-16
(#3323246@0)
-
sorry, I read a real book. not the one from the website.....
-o2o2o2(铃儿);
2006-11-16
(#3323250@0)
-
here
-hubeir(洞庭湖之北);
2006-11-16
(#3323370@0)
-
Thanks.
-gthm(愿闻其详);
2006-11-16
(#3323520@0)
-
顶！结论很精辟。意识形态和艺术自由的关系
-hubeir(洞庭湖之北);
2006-11-16
{24}
(#3323359@0)
-
还没读怎么知道? 与您的观点一致的就是精辟? 有先入为主之嫌. 虽然我在这个观点上与你有同样的倾向, 但还是要砸你一砖.
-klassische(老音乐迷);
2006-11-16
(#3324107@0)
-
没读原书也能知道此结论正确 ...至于从原书中能否得出这一结论，是另一回事这就叫“强词夺理”，嘿嘿
-hubeir(洞庭湖之北);
2006-11-16
{24}
(#3324443@0)
-
能够引起人们思考的书，才是好书。没看过这本书，但你这个长篇思考，让我觉得这应该是本好书。。。
-noproblem(大可以);
2006-11-16
(#3323382@0)
-
是好书，不愧Nobel的得主
-fortunemaker(狂热);
2006-11-16
(#3323517@0)
-
耳闻过,尚未读.您的书评很钓人胃口.谢谢.
-tseng(雨烟);
2006-11-16
(#3323573@0)
-
写的很好. 尤其是对该书内容的描述. 最后一段的反思也很有见地. 不过您体会到的小说的意义与另一个人体会到的意义也可能是很不一样的. 所以我们都要自己去读. 不过您的评论激起了大家读的欲望, 这就是好的评论!
-klassische(老音乐迷);
2006-11-16
(#3324102@0)
-
我来砸一砖吧：This review contains excessive spoilers. You give away too much information on the plot, makes me wonder whether it's still necessary to read the novel after reading your review.
-lifesucks(选择你最喜欢的昵称！);
2006-11-16
(#3324543@0)
-
A good review should leave the reader intrigued, unsatisfied, and wanting more. I'm afraid your review does the opposite to me. I feel there is nothing left for me discover.~~
-lifesucks(选择你最喜欢的昵称！);
2006-11-16
(#3324546@0)
-
我不同意你的意见。那么复杂的书不是这一两句能概括的。你必须知道你读书的目的，为情节？为人物？为了知识？或者只是因为要读而读？lz的读后感真的写的很好，就是对我这种人，本来就不想读这本书的（notmy style)，看了lz的读后感就行了：）还要说一句的是，lz写的是读后感，不是书评。
-mine888(老想上进);
2006-11-17
{42}
(#3324862@0)
-
As much as I admire 楼主's comprehensive discussion, I think it is imperative that disclosure of the plot should be kept at a level that is both revelatory and effectively intriguing. Here 楼主 pretty much gave away the big BANG at the end.To me 读后感 is review.
-lifesucks(选择你最喜欢的昵称！);
2006-11-17
{23}
(#3325294@0)
-
书评和读后感我觉得还是两回事。书评会从更广泛的角度去评价一本书。读后感只是自己的感想，哪怕就对书中一点事，一点情节发表感想。我觉得作者的水平可能还没到写书评的地步。
-mine888(老想上进);
2006-11-17
(#3325302@0)