This topic has been archived. It cannot be replied.
-
枫下茶话 / 政治经济 / VT枪击案的启示:当一个疯子持枪向你和你的家人冲过来时,真正能保护你和你所爱的人的不是警察, 法院和禁枪法,而是在你手中的一只枪.所以,持枪和用枪的训练,不仅是权利,而是一种男人的义务,和养家保护儿童一样.
-calgarian(ThanksFlames);
2007-4-24
{938}
(#3633910@0)
-
可以用绷弓子
-dodotoron(哇咧);
2007-4-24
(#3633917@0)
-
如果绷弓子伤了人,也得禁!
-calgarian(ThanksFlames);
2007-4-24
(#3633928@0)
-
Has your Harper been trying to scrap the gun registry?
-axe(Just A Joke);
2007-4-24
(#3633965@0)
-
青蛙的听觉器官在后腿 - zt.某生理学学生要研究青蛙腿的功能，于是将青蛙放在桌上，拍一下桌子，蛙跳1米；然后切去青蛙一条后腿，拍一下桌子，蛙跳0.5米；再切去一条后腿，此时无论怎么拍桌子青蛙都无法跳跃，遂得出结论：青蛙的听觉器官在后腿。
但这还不够，于是该学生继续切除青蛙前腿，饱受折磨的青蛙此时终于一命呜呼，于是该学生惊呼：青蛙的生命中枢位于前腿！
=====================
不是我针对你，我看你的推理跟这个小故事有一拼。
-buma(buma);
2007-4-24
{394}
(#3633987@0)
-
至少这些学生们想通过实验来求证.VT事一出就跳出来要禁枪的就像干想得出青蛙的视觉在背上一样.
-calgarian(ThanksFlames);
2007-4-24
(#3634003@0)
-
The little half yankee is such a J E R K. You must hide many guns including your HARPER's.
-axe(Just A Joke);
2007-4-24
(#3634006@0)
-
Be honest with you, after the rampage in VT, I am going to get myself a gun at home. Of course, after a month or so. Right now, an Asian holding a gun is not such a good idea.
-calgarian(ThanksFlames);
2007-4-24
(#3634012@0)
-
WOW, are you Asian? I remember that you did claim you are half yankee.
-axe(Just A Joke);
2007-4-24
(#3634025@0)
-
heck, two wrongs don't make a right, enough said.
-buma(buma);
2007-4-24
(#3634008@0)
-
你的青蛙寓言和two wrongs，看起来很有哲理，其实什么也没有说。价值接近于零。
-worker1008(worker1008);
2007-4-24
(#3634044@0)
-
hehe, 可能对很多人来说，价值的确就是零， ;)10 secs of your precious life has gone because of reading this and it will never come back. don't claim that I ruined ur life for that.
-buma(buma);
2007-4-24
{136}
(#3634098@0)
-
I guess just want you to make yourself clearer. Being overly subtle sometimes is close to standing for nothing, speaking nothing, which is typical among lefties.
-calgarian(ThanksFlames);
2007-4-24
(#3634190@0)
-
当一个疯狗张牙舞爪向你和你的家人冲过来时,真正能保护你和你所爱的人的不是警察, 法院和禁狗令,而是在你嘴中的一口牙.所以,咬人或咬狗,不仅是权利,而是一种男人的义务,和养家保护儿童一样.当然前提是你要比疯狗更疯,否则你咬不过它.
-wzap(识食物者为俊杰);
2007-4-24
(#3634064@0)
-
虽然我不觉得楼主的说法很有说服力，不过你的说法更糟，倒像是在为楼主做证明。功力太低啊
-worker1008(worker1008);
2007-4-24
(#3634083@0)
-
那种情况下, 你准备怎样保护你的孩子?给疯狗上一堂普法课
-calgarian(ThanksFlames);
2007-4-24
(#3634183@0)
-
可怜，你生活在疯狗堆儿里。
-xiaosaihong(箫赛红);
2007-4-26
(#3638285@0)
-
hmm
-buma(buma);
2007-4-25
{624}
(#3634770@0)
-
不要在那里含混地说事。你就直接地说，到底要怎样。是不是无论走到哪里，都要随身携带一把手枪？
-lionel(Lionel);
2007-4-25
(#3635269@0)
-
看来是不是该人手一枪啊。比如上班带枪，上学带枪，逛商场带枪，下馆子带枪。
-xiaosaihong(箫赛红);
2007-4-26
{599}
(#3638103@0)
-
要么限制，要么就可能变成这样。
-hhorse(hhorse);
2007-4-26
(#3638290@0)
-
干脆发展到国家级：每个国家都大量制造造原子弹，洲际导弹。看哪个国家不爽就先炸过去。
-lionel(Lionel);
2007-4-26
(#3638672@0)
-
上面的俩位左派都是一根筋,你如果想”金兵有狼牙棒,我有老婆孩子的天灵盖”,请便.只是不要用禁枪区等让别人也用天灵盖来顶狼牙棒. VT的学生老师在生命受到威胁时应有机会用枪来保护自己.但”禁枪区”让他们只有被屠杀.
-calgarian(ThanksFlames);
2007-4-27
(#3639165@0)
-
金兵要是有原子弹呢？你的狼琊榜咋用？
-xiaosaihong(箫赛红);
2007-4-27
(#3639455@0)
-
CHO先生能买到原子弹吗?
-sherwood(sherwood);
2007-4-27
(#3639463@0)
-
所以说嘛，不禁止就可以买得到啊。偶好怕啊。
-xiaosaihong(箫赛红);
2007-4-27
(#3639835@0)
-
怪可怜呢。昨儿个还说身边有疯狗呢，今天又多了金兵了。
-xiaosaihong(箫赛红);
2007-4-27
(#3639501@0)
-
持枪并不是一个简单的对错的问题. 因此才在美国陷于长期的争论. 楼主当然代表了一方的观点.并不是没有道理, 而且也很容易理解.对社会和人身造成的损失和枪只的关系也不好简单下结论.
-humormaster(李聃);
2007-4-26
(#3638473@0)
-
李同学说的有理，枪支在美国是个历史问题，也是个文化问题。但是楼主的意图却简单的很，可以用”凡是保守的东西都要支持的“来概括。这位卡尔加里人是”屁股决定脑袋的“。
-xiaosaihong(箫赛红);
2007-4-26
(#3638513@0)
-
What you say might be true. But I feel you always try to put things into a black and white way. But I believe 99% of world is gray,not black and white. I feel you are not neutral, thus your opinion.
-win(秋天的菠菜);
2007-4-27
(#3639511@0)
-
Principles are black and white. I believe people should stand for the principles they believe; however they might act practically. Besides, there are enough left propagandas for gun control. I was just trying to balance the debate.
-calgarian(ThanksFlames);
2007-4-30
(#3643626@0)