Topic: 关心自己生活的人可看看这篇文章 - Evaluating Harper's economic performance @华人论坛:枫下论坛 The Rolia Forum of

枫下茶话 / 政治经济 / 关心自己生活的人可看看这篇文章 - Evaluating Harper's economic performance -tonytonytony(tony); 2008-9-14 {5148} (#4687688@0)

some highlights -Harper refers to prudent spending, but that's hardly the case. Harper's budgets have forecast big increases in government spending, then exceeded those targets. -tonytonytony(tony); 2008-9-14 (#4687690@0)
Positioning Canada in a competitive global economy is one of the most important things a government can contribute to, but in Harper's term in office, it has been difficult to discern any direction for the economy. -tonytonytony(tony); 2008-9-14 (#4687692@0)
So far in this campaign, Harper has announced a cut in the tax on diesel and jet fuel. If it has any effect, it will be to lessen the pressure for new, fuel- efficient technologies. -tonytonytony(tony); 2008-9-14 (#4687694@0)
因为工作的原因，一直在follow美国经济危机。实在是不愿看到加拿大heading into the same direction。 -tonytonytony(tony); 2008-9-14 (#4687707@0)

哈帕只会亲美，对像中国这样的贸易伙伴冷然处之，对美国经济的依赖很重，对油价增高不理，对制造业不采取措施（但是政府开支并没有“prudent”）；内阁要员公开说本国的省份不值得外商投资....... 这只能让危机更加沉重。 -qibinglian(骑兵连连长); 2008-9-14 (#4687995@0)

哈泼只注重玩弄外交, 比如阿富汗问题, 乌克兰问题, 西藏独立问题等, 完全忽略加拿大国内的问题, 比如教育, 医疗, 枪支控制,环保, 加元以及油价上涨对制造业的影响等. -god-father(godfather); 2008-9-14 (#4688076@0)
对像中国这样的贸易伙伴冷然处之。直接的效果就是伤害了加拿大的工业. Bombardier， Nortel，BMO， etc，在中国立马就竞争不过美国的公司。问题是Harper does not care, because both Ontario and Quebec are not his political base! -tonytonytony(tony); 2008-9-14 (#4688271@0)

我会投自由党的。 -townsl(风筝); 2008-9-14 (#4688279@0)
你还挺能编,Nortel那种破烂2001年自己就差点玩完,后来自己弄出点丑闻,又没有新技术,还竞争那.看看自由党在台上时Nortel的表现就知道乐. -weichen2005(微尘); 2008-9-14 (#4688299@0)

Nortel也许烂吧。如果我把Nortel换成RIM，你是否就我同意的观点了？ -tonytonytony(tony); 2008-9-14 (#4688301@0)

呵呵，06年RIM 的股价是20左右，现在是112.36。在这之前大多数在20以下。 -weichen2005(微尘); 2008-9-14 (#4688325@0)

我没有数据，但是我相信Nortel hire more Chinese immigrants than any of Candian Oil companies! -tonytonytony(tony); 2008-9-14 (#4688309@0)
让我们再看看Bombardier，股票价格是衡量一个企业发展好坏的最好指标。Bombardier的股价从2001年大约25的价位到2006年跌倒约3块的价位(自由党真是好),相反从2006年起,Bombardier的股价从3块左右升到7块左右.呵呵 -weichen2005(微尘); 2008-9-14 (#4688319@0)

你想说明什么问题? Do you want to say that Bombardier would be better off , if they do not do business with China? Or you want to say that Harper tried very hard to promote Bombardier's competitive power? -tonytonytony(tony); 2008-9-14 (#4688323@0)

我想说的是所谓"对像中国这样的贸易伙伴冷然处之。直接的效果就是伤害了加拿大的工业. Bombardier， Nortel，BMO， etc，在中国立马就竞争不过美国的公司"根本就是胡扯。数据是最好的说明。 -weichen2005(微尘); 2008-9-14 (#4688327@0)

你不要胡搅蛮缠。 Competitive power is not something that you can build in one day. For the same reason, the hard to the competitive is not reflected in one day. The company I am with has an office in Beijing. -tonytonytony(tony); 2008-9-14 (#4688337@0)

你还是从加拿大企业自身上找问题吧，不要试图把屎扣在某个政党身上。Bombardier这种自由党嫡系企业在亲共自由党执政这么长的时间内都没搞好说明它的好坏与保守党执政无关，就这么简单。 -weichen2005(微尘); 2008-9-14 (#4688346@0)

Not sure if you have read it in entirety. It is a balanced article. Harper government did increased the spending, which put much money in economy so we are not hit as hard as Americans do. -calgarian(目光似（比）月色寂寞); 2008-9-14 (#4688899@0)

The author is trying to be neutral to make the article politically correct. I think the tune is suspicious to Harper's policy. I do not think Harper is stupid and does not know the answer. He just has to act on behalf of his political base. -tonytonytony(tony); 2008-9-14 (#4688958@0)

@