This topic has been archived. It cannot be replied.
-
枫下茶话 / 政治经济 / 布什这个大草包彻底把美国带沟里去了,“死孩子没救”多少钱都没用了。。。连带全世界跟着倒霉。。!萨达姆可以安息了。。早晚的事。。布什死得比老萨难看多了。。。甭猜,拉灯这阵子肯定乐得死去活来的。。。为了他和他的老萨兄弟美国居然轰然倒地。。。这结果肯定远远超过老萨和拉登的想象。。。无它。。。他们的对头布什是在太笨了。。。挥刀自宫了!
-tigar25(大忽悠);
2008-10-10
{92}
(#4755860@0)
-
there is nothing to cheer about.
-mikesmith(老猫);
2008-10-10
(#4755862@0)
-
原本是的。。。可惜事到如今Cheer不Cheer一样得死。。。一样要输钱。。。没人能幸免。。。骂上两句过过嘴瘾总比钱被人抢了去无声无息强。。。!
-tigar25(大忽悠);
2008-10-10
(#4755890@0)
-
Bush is inapt but he is not the one that caused this crisis. This really started during Greenspan/Clinton time when they allowed the financial market to deregulate and run wide.A lot of risky, toxic, worthless financial derivatives and securities were created and sold at ridiculous prices which set the time bomb for the current crisis. They also encouraged everyone who could not afford a house to buy one with 0 interest and 0 down in order to achieve their 'American dreams'. Bush's mistake is not to step in and regulate the market, because he needs the revenue generated by all these to finance his war. You know you can't ask too much of this guy.
-omega4(omega);
2008-10-10
{481}
(#4755891@0)
-
完全正确,
-99miles(帝子乘风下翠微);
2008-10-10
(#4755903@0)
-
那些东东是克林顿时期才有的。。。?克林顿政府留下的5万亿盈余被布什折腾的倒输3万亿。。。能赖别人?!
-tigar25(大忽悠);
2008-10-10
(#4755924@0)
-
5万亿盈余?
-99miles(帝子乘风下翠微);
2008-10-10
(#4755931@0)
-
确切的说是5.6万亿。。。
-tigar25(大忽悠);
2008-10-10
(#4755941@0)
-
Wrong. Federal budget surplus was $230 B in 2000, less than 5% if the amount you quote. The primary reason for this surplus is the financial tricks played by Greenspan which is the root cause of the crisis we have now (see my post above)
-omega4(omega);
2008-10-10
(#4756012@0)
-
President Clinton announced Wednesday that the federal budget surplus for fiscal year 2000 amounted to at least $230 billion, making it the largest in U.S. history and topping last year's record surplus of $122.7 billion. 说的是一年吧?
-tigar25(大忽悠);
2008-10-10
(#4756083@0)
-
时势造草包,美国的制度,只靠一个草包没有如此威力,如同文化大革命,毛主席只是亲手发起者,群众才是主角。
-caa(移民的孙悟空lifeisok);
2008-10-10
(#4755932@0)
-
同学,任何事没有高人起来忽悠是不行D。。。老毛忽悠起来了文革。。。群众都被他老人家牵着鼻子乱闹。。。布什确实草包他没想弄出今天这局面来,可惜实在太笨,无心插柳弄出这么个大头佛来。。。!现在只要他一出来说话股市反应就是立刻狂跌。。。
-tigar25(大忽悠);
2008-10-10
(#4755990@0)
-
Bush不是一个一般的草包,所以他才威力无比。同样,没有毛主席的亲自发动,群众也当不了主角。时事造草包,有些道理。
-bonjour(不是行家);
2008-10-10
(#4756040@0)
-
政府过多的盈余(或赤字),只能说政府的管理有问题。我们可以说因为克林顿政府的税收太重了,实际上联邦政府并不需要这么多钱,所以盈余才会这么多,看一个政府如何,不能单纯去看盈余或赤字。。。
-noproblem(。o O);
2008-10-10
(#4756111@0)
-
哦。。原来是这样。。。这样看来布什可真是美国人民的大救星啊。。。帮助美国把那些不良盈余花出去解决了美国人民以致世界人民的疾苦。。。
-tigar25(大忽悠);
2008-10-10
(#4756139@0)
-
Bush政府即不是魔鬼也不是善主,最好的政府应该是做到预算上的收支平衡。其实你可以用这个理由反驳我:布什政府在没有增加税率的情况下,收到的税收比克林顿政府少很多,说明现在美国人民的收入减少了很多。。。LOL
-noproblem(。o O);
2008-10-10
(#4756182@0)
-
一般貌似好笑的贴俺都不反驳。。。让大伙多笑笑。。。
-tigar25(大忽悠);
2008-10-10
(#4757236@0)
-
说得有道理, 让人无法反驳
-99miles(帝子乘风下翠微);
2008-10-10
(#4757249@0)
-
克林顿政府后期的时候,市场泡沫增加了很多,因此政府的税收比预期的多了,于是就产生了大量的财政盈余。
-lionel(Lionel);
2008-10-10
(#4756161@0)
-
我想你的这番评论连布什自己都不敢大声说出来。布什台上8年,做了些什么,关心过民生问题吗?美国的经济问题有其根本的制度性缺陷。但是总统的不作为,责无旁贷!
-kingsw(Steven);
2008-10-10
(#4756256@0)
-
Underlying the US policy is a national greed and ignorance. - Even a few days ago, in the midst of the economic turmoil, a US reas estate agent (without offence, but she is dark coloured) was still claiming on TVeverybody is entitled to the American dream of owning a house no matter what.
-letempsdescerises(混世俗人);
2008-10-10
{77}
(#4756264@0)
-
At the end, the American may have to do the 'unthinkable' to save themselves, shutdown most overseas military bases and cancel all foreign aid to balance the budgetslap a high duty on all import goods to pop up domestic production and jobs and balance trade deficit, or even a national default to cancel all debts it owes like the Icelanders did. Doing this will be disastarous for the rest of world, but sometime you simply don't have another option.
-omega4(omega);
2008-10-10
{288}
(#4757221@0)
-
US government will never default as all its debt is in US dollar. Again, US debt/GDP ratio is around 40%, Defense budge/GDP = 4%, all no problems. Trade deficit is not national debt, people deliberately confuse the twoFor example, China sells more to US and buys less back, What china got is a bunch of US dollars. Neither US government and companies owe anyting to Chinese entities. China uses the dollar to buy US debt securities. The problem is the national debt/GDP ratio, which is still low compare with other countries.
-cerboros_redux(Cerboros Reborn);
2008-10-10
{307}
(#4757274@0)
-
National debt is about 9.5trillion, GDP is about 14 billion. That's about 70% GDP. Not very low. Do not forget the obligations on their entitlement programs, which amount to 50 trillion or so.
-colourwolf(Va, Pensiero);
2008-10-10
(#4757504@0)
-
And the current financial and housing market crisis will deal a huge blow to the future GDP numbers. The Americans have been doing the stupid things for so many years, outsourcing jobs and production capabilities to Asia,turning industrial communities into ghost towns, while relying on Wall Street's speculative financial tricks and foreign debts to feed its money machine. Now the day of reckoning has come. It's time to correct the ship, but it's probably too late already
-omega4(omega);
2008-10-10
{258}
(#4757595@0)